← Financial Report💸 Cost & Margin Analysis
From the Master Pricing workbook (160 services) · validated against the actual P&L
Headline: the workbook flags all 160 services HEALTHY — but it assumes a 38% groomer commission and $0 overhead. Using the real 48% commission from the P&L, 62 services flip to WATCH; adding real facility overhead, 69 land in ALERT (>55% cost) — almost entirely full grooms.
Rate reconciliation — workbook vs reality
Margin reveal — three layers
Workbook (38%, $0 OH)
160 ✓
ALERT cluster: Dog Full Zen Groom (25), Dog Tidy Trio (25), Cat Full Zen Groom (15) — the commission + time on full grooms eats the margin.
⚠ Losing-money list — worst services (fully loaded)
Why: 48% commission + ~$0.28/min facility time. Largest/double-coat sizes are worst (longest drying/dematting). Only 59/160 services carry a matting fee — matted coats add unbilled time → undercharge.
✓ Pricing headroom — raise these (deep margin)
Baths, Zen Refresh, and Cat Tidy Kitty run 13–24% loaded cost — large margin. If under the competitive set, room to raise $5–15 with no margin risk.
What to do
1. Full grooms: raise price ~10–20% or enforce a matting/de-shed fee — they're underwater at real cost. 2. Baths/refresh: healthy headroom — raise toward market. 3. Fix the model: set the workbook commission to 48% and enter a real overhead $/groom (currently $0) so it flags reality. 4. Casey/Mia: reclassify as groomers (they groom), not apprentice-bathers.
Analysis only — pricing changes are Linda's call, tied to the competitive set. The validated cost inputs (48% comm · ~$23 overhead/groom · ~$55 true cost) are handed to the GM dashboard.